Test_1-4

TEST 1

Test Case ID: BIS-1.1.1 Test Name: TC_ID_SECURE_DEBUG_INTERFACES


Objective

To identify the availability of debugging interfaces (e.g., USB, UART, JTAG, or other serial variants) in the DUT by reviewing the datasheet of the SoC used in the device under test.


Tools Used

  • OEM-provided SoC datasheet

  • DUT hardware documentation

  • Technical specifications document


Test Execution Steps

  1. Document Collection

    • Obtain the official datasheet from the OEM detailing all ports/interfaces available on the SoC used in the DUT.

  2. Document Review

    • Review the datasheet and related documentation to check for the presence of any debugging interfaces such as USB, UART, JTAG, or other serial communication ports.

  3. State Verification

    • Verify in the documentation whether each identified interface is enabled, disabled, or protected by an authentication mechanism in the production firmware/hardware.


Expected Results for Pass

  • All available debugging interfaces are clearly identified as per OEM documentation.

  • The default operational state (enabled/disabled/protected) is specified for each interface in the production configuration.


Test Observations

(Insert your findings here — e.g., "OEM documentation indicates UART and USB debug interfaces are physically present but disabled in production units.")


Evidence Provided

  • Copy of SoC datasheet highlighting interface details

  • Screenshot or excerpt from OEM interface configuration document

  • Photographic evidence of DUT ports (if applicable)


Test Case Result

Pass – Interfaces identified and state documented as per requirement ☐ Fail – Missing/incorrect identification or unclear interface state


TEST 2

Test Case ID: BIS-1.1.2 Test Name: TC_VERIFY_SECURE_DEBUG_INTERFACES


Objective

To verify and validate that all debug ports/interfaces enabled in production devices match the vendor documentation, and that the declared access control mechanisms (e.g., password complexity, authentication controls) are correctly implemented and effective.


Tools Used

  • OEM-provided debug/communication tools

  • DUT production firmware configuration

  • Serial/USB/UART interface testing hardware (if applicable)


Test Execution Steps

  1. Production Configuration Setup

    • Ensure the DUT is configured to match production environment settings.

  2. OEM Documentation Review

    • Obtain OEM documentation specifying all debug interfaces, their default operational state, and implemented protection mechanisms.

  3. Interface Interaction

    • Attempt to connect to each debug interface using OEM-provided debugging and communication tools to determine operational status.

  4. Security Validation

    • If an interface is declared as protected, attempt controlled access to confirm the effectiveness of the security measures (e.g., password authentication, access control).

    • If an interface is declared as disabled, verify no interaction or access is possible.


Expected Results for Pass

  • All debug interfaces match the state documented by the OEM (enabled/disabled/protected).

  • Declared access controls (password complexity, access control mechanisms) function effectively and prevent unauthorized access.


Test Observations

(Insert findings here — e.g., "UART interface detected physically but disabled in firmware; USB debug port enabled with password authentication; password complexity validated successfully.")


Evidence Provided

  • Screenshots of access attempts

  • Serial console logs

  • Photographs of DUT interface panels with status indication

  • OEM documentation excerpts


Test Case Result

Pass – All interfaces and protections match OEM documentation ☐ Fail – Discrepancy between documentation and actual interface state or protection


TEST 3

Test Case ID: BIS-1.1.3 Test Name: TC_OEM_SECURE_DEBUG_INTERFACES


Objective

To test, in the presence of the OEM team, the enabling/disabling status of all ports and debugging interfaces (e.g., USB, UART, JTAG, and other serial variants) using relevant hardware-based debuggers and to verify that appropriate access control mechanisms are in place if any interface is enabled.


Tools Used

  • OEM-provided debug/communication tools

  • Hardware-based debuggers (USB/UART/JTAG adapters)

  • DUT configuration interface (CLI/Web UI if applicable)

  • Multimeter or logic analyzer (for signal detection, if required)


Execution Steps

  1. Session Coordination

    • Schedule and conduct the test session with the OEM team present to ensure transparency and validation.

  2. Interface Status Verification

    • Systematically check each physical and logical debug interface to confirm its operational state matches OEM documentation.

  3. Security Mechanism Testing

    • Where an interface is enabled, use hardware-based debuggers and access control tools to validate authentication and protection mechanisms.

  4. Disablement Validation

    • Where an interface is documented as disabled, confirm no data or interaction is possible through physical or logical connection attempts.


Expected Results for Pass

  • Enable/disable status for each interface matches OEM documentation.

  • All enabled interfaces have effective protection mechanisms in place.

  • Disabled interfaces show no response to access attempts.


Test Observations

(Insert findings here — e.g., "USB debug interface detected and disabled as per documentation; UART interface enabled with password authentication, verified functional; JTAG disabled and no signal detected.")


Evidence Provided

  • Photographs of DUT with ports highlighted

  • Logs from debugger connection attempts

  • Screenshots of access control validation

  • OEM-signed confirmation document


Test Case Result

Pass – All interface states validated successfully in OEM presence ☐ Fail – One or more discrepancies found between documentation and observed results

TEST 4

Test Case ID: BIS-1.1.4 Test Name: TC_PROCESS_SECURE_DEBUG_INTERFACES


Description

To conduct a process audit of the manufacturing facility to validate the vendor’s claim that all debugging interfaces (USB, UART, JTAG, and other serial variants) are closed/disabled or adequately secured during the device provisioning stage.


Tools Used

  • Vendor-provided manufacturing/provisioning documentation

  • Audit checklist (derived from vendor security claims and requirements)

  • Block connection diagrams and process flowcharts

  • OEM process compliance documents


Execution Steps

  1. Audit Preparation

    • Develop an audit checklist based on vendor security requirements and claims regarding debug interface management.

  2. Process Review

    • Review the actual provisioning process steps against the documented claims for disabling or securing debug interfaces.

  3. Documentation Assessment

    • Examine vendor-provided block connection diagrams, process flowcharts, and relevant provisioning records to ensure alignment with stated security measures.

  4. Verification

    • Confirm that any debug interfaces present are appropriately secured or disabled before the device leaves the manufacturing facility.


Expected Results for Pass

  • The manufacturing/provisioning process fully matches the vendor’s documented claims.

  • Debug interfaces are confirmed to be disabled or secured during provisioning.

  • Documentation (block connection diagrams, process flows) is consistent with actual practice.


Test Observations

(Insert findings here — e.g., "Audit confirmed that USB and UART ports are disabled during provisioning; JTAG interface physically disconnected as per process flow.")


Evidence Provided

  • Completed audit checklist

  • Photographs of provisioning process

  • Copies of block connection diagrams

  • Signed vendor confirmation


Test Case Result

Pass – Process fully aligns with vendor’s documented claims ☐ Fail – Discrepancy found between documentation and actual provisioning process


Overall Test Result

(Summarize overall result for BIS-1.1 series — e.g., "All four test cases passed; Secure Debug Interfaces verified and compliant with requirements.")

Last updated

Was this helpful?